An investigation into cosmetic surgery chains by KFF Health News and NBC News has prompted consumer warnings from industry groups representing plastic surgeons and a call for more transparency around physician disciplinary actions in California.<\/p>\n
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, which represents 12,000 doctors, is now warning patients to \u201cdo their homework\u201d before getting liposuction, a Brazilian butt lift, a \u201cMommy Makeover,\u201d or other cosmetic procedures.<\/p>\n
\u201cPlastic surgery is real surgery with real risks, and the risk of complications is never zero,\u201d said Scott Hollenbeck, immediate past president of the plastic surgeons group.<\/p>\n
And in an exclusive interview, TJ Watkins, a member of California\u2019s medical licensing board, called for greater transparency in the secretive process for disciplining physicians, saying the board should alert the public about doctors under investigation for alleged misconduct.<\/p>\n
Hollenback and Watkins were reacting to the \u201cBody Shops<\/a>\u201d series, which examined allegations of disfiguring injuries or even deaths tied to cosmetic surgeries.<\/p>\n One story revealed that California plastic surgeon Heidi Regenass had three patients die<\/a> within a few months after liposuction and fat transfer operations, according to medical malpractice lawsuits filed in California courts.<\/p>\n A complaint to the medical board from a patient\u2019s daughter triggered an internal board review of the surgeon, but the public will hear nothing until the investigation is concluded, which can take years.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you were really protecting the patients, there would be a notice right now that says this doctor is being investigated,\u201d said Watkins, one of seven nonphysicians appointed to the medical board to represent consumers.<\/p>\n Regenass, a board-certified plastic surgeon, did not respond\u00a0to numerous requests for comment on the patient deaths. In response to medical malpractice lawsuits filed by families of the three women, she has denied any negligence or that her actions caused any deaths. One case was settled in 2024, while the two others are pending in California courts.<\/p>\n On Feb. 9, the California medical board filed an administrative complaint<\/a> against Regenass unrelated to the three patient deaths. The complaint accuses Regenass of \u201crepeated negligent acts\u201d in caring for a 49-year-old woman who had liposuction on her abdomen and arms with a fat transfer to her buttocks in July 2022. The board alleged that the surgeon \u201cfailed to document an appropriate physical examination prior to surgery\u201d and did not keep \u201cadequate and accurate records\u201d of the woman\u2019s care. The board requested an administrative hearing on the accusations, though no date has been set. Lawyers for Regenass didn\u2019t respond to a request for comment on the new complaint.<\/p>\n Some patient lawsuits have accused cosmetic surgery companies of hiring doctors who lacked adequate training<\/a> or had troubled pasts<\/a>, and of using high-pressure sales tactics and misleading advertising pitches<\/a> that downplay safety risks, federal and state court records show. The companies dispute these allegations and have won dismissal of some suits. Other cases have been settled under confidential terms, although a Georgia judge late last year awarded $52 million<\/a> to the family of a woman who died after liposuction and a Brazilian butt lift.<\/p>\n Christopher Nuland, an attorney and lobbyist for the Florida Society of Plastic Surgeons, said that the \u201cBody Shops\u201d investigation \u201cunderscores the need for vigilance from all parties.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThere is an opportunity for better legislation, such as regulating post-surgical recovery centers and better enforcement of existing laws,\u201d he said in an email. \u201cBut patients need to take an active part by ensuring that they are seeing a board-certified plastic surgeon in an accredited facility and that neither has a history of bad outcomes.\u201d<\/p>\n Nuland said his group supports a bill<\/a> pending in the Florida Legislature that would require licenses and set quality standards for recovery houses where patients often stay to recuperate for a few days after cosmetic surgery. Florida officials have struggled<\/a> for years to regulate unlicensed facilities that often charge patients hundreds of dollars per night, though they may lack adequate medical staffing.<\/p>\n Cosmetic surgery companies, some financed by private equity investors<\/a>, are competing in a growing U.S. body-contouring market in which patients are charged up to $20,000 out-of-pocket, or on credit, for these procedures. Ads promise life-changing body reshaping techniques with minimal risk and quick recovery times<\/a>.<\/p>\n As the cosmetic surgery companies have grown, there\u2019s been little regulatory oversight. There\u2019s no federal public database to assist patients in tracking these companies\u2019 safety records, their staffing standards, or how commonly patients suffer severe complications. And complaints to medical boards about surgeons or other doctors can remain under wraps for years.<\/p>\n Ste\u2019Aira Ballard, whose mother, Tamala Smith, died in 2023 after Regenass operated on her, filed a complaint with the California Medical Board in early 2025.<\/p>\n In March 2025, the board notified Ballard it had forwarded her complaint to the state Department of Consumer Affairs Health Quality Investigation Unit\u2019s Santa Ana field office \u201cfor further investigation.\u201d Ballard said a state investigator interviewed her in June, but neither the existence of the review nor its status has been made public. Ballard provided copies of her correspondence with the state to KFF Health News and NBC News.\u00a0<\/p>\n Asked for comment, California Medical Board spokesperson Alexandria Schembra said the board \u201cis not authorized to post complaint information about a physician\u201d unless it obtains an emergency suspension of the doctor\u2019s license or files a formal administrative complaint.<\/p>\n \u201cThe public reporting of a patient death prior to the Board having sufficient evidence to prove that the licensee violated the Medical Practice Act would require the Legislature and Governor to enact a law change,\u201d she wrote in an email.<\/p>\n But the board\u2019s Watkins said he believes that the disciplinary process is rigged in favor of doctors, mostly because of the power of medical groups in the state lobbying to thwart change.<\/p>\n \u201cNobody is protecting the patient,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n NBC News producer Jason Kane and correspondent Erin McLaughlin contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n KFF Health News<\/a> is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF\u2014an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF<\/a>.<\/p>\nUSE OUR CONTENT<\/h3>\n