{"id":1387,"date":"2024-10-21T07:21:00","date_gmt":"2024-10-21T07:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/?p=1387"},"modified":"2024-10-21T07:21:00","modified_gmt":"2024-10-21T07:21:00","slug":"youre-not-going-to-automate-my-job","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/?p=1387","title":{"rendered":"You\u2019re Not Going to Automate MY Job"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<\/div>\n<p>By KIM BELLARD<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this month U.S. dockworkers struck, for the first time in decades. Their union, the International Longshoremen\u2019s Association (ILW), was demanding a 77% pay increase, rejecting an offer of a 50% pay increase from the shipping companies. People worried about the impact on the economy, how it might impact the upcoming election, even if Christmas would be ruined. Some panic hoarding <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/money\/shopping\/2024\/10\/02\/port-dockworkers-strike-stockpiling-2024\/75481058007\/\">ensued<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Then, just three days later, the strike was over, with an agreement for a 60% wage increase over six years. Work resumed. Everyone\u2019s happy right? Well, no. The agreement is only a truce until January 15, 2025. While money was certainly an issue \u2013 it always is \u2013 the real issue is automation, and the two sides are far apart on that.<\/p>\n<p>Most of us aren\u2019t dockworkers, of course, but their union\u2019s attitude towards automation has lessons for our jobs nonetheless.<\/p>\n<p>The advent of shipping containers in the 1960\u2019s (if you haven\u2019t read <a href=\"https:\/\/press.princeton.edu\/books\/paperback\/9780691170817\/the-box?srsltid=AfmBOoqC8EBdddQT8t7ds3ibVvFytFHlt_VMiK8oebhmpyfEiO64jMFN\"><em>The Box<\/em>:\u00a0<em>How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em>by Marc Levinson, I highly recommend it) made increased use of automation in the shipping industry not only possible but inevitable. The ports, the shipping companies, and the unions all knew this, and have been fighting about it ever since. Add better robots and, now, AI to the mix, and one wonders when the whole process will be automated.<\/p>\n<p>Curiously, the U.S. is not a leader in this automation. Margaret Kidd, program director and associate professor of supply chain logistics at the University of Houston, <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/technology\/4914074-union-port-strike-automation-fears\/\">told <em>The Hill<\/em><\/a>: \u201cWhat most Americans don\u2019t realize is that American exceptionalism does not exist in our port system. Our infrastructure is antiquated. Our use of automation and technology is antiquated.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Eric Boehm of <em>Reason <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2024\/10\/04\/automate-the-ports\/\">agrees<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>The problem is that American ports <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ttnews.com\/articles\/automated-ports-help-carriers-get-and-out-facilities-faster\">need more automation<\/a> <em>just to catch up<\/em> with what\u2019s considered normal in the rest of the world. For example, automated cranes in use at the port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands\u00a0since the 1990s are <a href=\"https:\/\/savannahceo.com\/news\/2015\/10\/why-arent-americas-shipping-ports-automated\/\">80 percent faster<\/a> than the human-operated cranes used at the port in Oakland, California, according to an estimate by one trade publication.<\/p>\n<p>The top rated U.S. port in the World Bank\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/documents1.worldbank.org\/curated\/en\/099060324114539683\/pdf\/P17583313892300871be641a5ea7b90e0e6.pdf\">annual performance index<\/a> is only 53rd. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sixty-two ports worldwide \u2013 out of some 1300 \u2013 are considered semi- or fully automated. According to Heather Long <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/2024\/10\/01\/dock-worker-strike-jobs-pay-automation\/\">in <em>WaPo<\/em><\/a>, the U.S. has 3 ports that are considered fully automated and another three that are considered semi-automated.\u00a0 Loading and unloading times in the U.S. are longer than competing ports. Increased use of automation, in some fashion and to some degree, is necessary to stay competitive.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the dockworkers are unmoved. In a <a href=\"https:\/\/ilaunion.org\/letter-of-opposition-to-usmxs-misleading-statement\/\">letter<\/a> to members, the ILW leader vowed: \u201cLet me be clear: we don\u2019t want any form of semi-automation or full automation. We want our jobs\u2014the jobs we have historically done for over 132 years.\u201d He insists the new six-year contract must include \u201cabsolute airtight language that there will be no automation or semiautomation\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe rest of the world is looking down on us because we\u2019re fighting automation,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2024\/10\/02\/business\/dock-workers-strike-automation-nightcap\/index.html\">said<\/a> Dennis Daggett, executive vice president of the ILA. \u201cRemember that this industry, this union has always adapted to innovation. But we will never adapt to robots taking our jobs.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This is what needs to get resolved by January. Wages are important, but only for those who have jobs. It very much reminds me of last year\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/p\/c22adf67831e\">Hollywood writer\u2019s strike<\/a>, which was partly about money, but also about not letting studios use generative AI to do their jobs.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s worth pointing out that dockworkers may not quite fit the typical blue collar union worker stereotype. <em>The Wall Street Journal<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/striking-dockworkers-are-top-earnerswhen-they-work-17c5f7e9?mod=Searchresults_pos1&amp;page=1\">reports<\/a> that the average, full-time dockworkers on the West Coast made $233,000, while more than half of their East Coast counterparts earned over $150,000. Not all dockworkers earn such amounts, nor has full-time work available, but \u2013 still.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Resisting automation is a great rallying cry to union members, but is not realistic. \u201cThe argument to stop automation now is slamming the barn door decades after the horse has gotten out. This is not going to work long term. The economic incentives behind it are too strong,\u201d Harley Shaiken, a professor emeritus at the University of California at Berkeley, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/business\/2024\/10\/05\/port-strike-workers-jobs-automation-union\/\">told <em>The Washington Post<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Levinson <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/business\/2024\/10\/05\/port-strike-workers-jobs-automation-union\/\">told <em>WaPo<\/em><\/a><em>: \u201c<\/em>In the past, the longshore unions have agreed to various types of automation, but there\u2019s always been some kind of price attached in terms of protecting the jobs and protecting the union\u2019s jurisdiction. And I assume that there is some price at which this dispute will be resolved.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Professor Kidd, <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/technology\/4914074-union-port-strike-automation-fears\/\"><em>in The Hill<\/em><\/a>, urged: \u201cThe ILA needs to be looking at a long-term vision. There\u2019s no industry \u2014 journalism, academia, manufacturing \u2014 that hasn\u2019t been changed by technology,\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Along those lines, Erik Brynjolfsson, the director of Standford University\u2019s Digital Economy Lab, <a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/technology\/4914074-union-port-strike-automation-fears\/\"><em>suggested to The Hill<\/em><\/a><em>:<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I find it very short-sighted of the dockworkers, or any workers, to be pushing against automation if you can instead, find a way that the gains get shared. I would hope that there\u2019s an opportunity there to strike an agreement where there is a lot more automation, not less automation and that some of the benefits get shared with the dockworkers and others.<\/p>\n<p>This is not just a dockworker\u2019s issue. As Ms. Long <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/2024\/10\/01\/dock-worker-strike-jobs-pay-automation\/\">wrote in <em>WaPo<\/em><\/a>, \u201cthe bigger reason everyone should pay attention is that this is an early battle of well-paid workers against advanced automation. There will be many more to come.\u201d Or, as Allison Morrow <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2024\/10\/02\/business\/dock-workers-strike-automation-nightcap\/index.html\">quipped in <em>CNN<\/em><\/a>: \u201cThe bots come for all of us, which is why the outcome of the port strike is particularly important to watch.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Maybe you\u2019re not a longshoreman, or a Hollywood writer. But the future is coming for your job too. I was struck by the title of an NYT op-ed by Jonathan Reisman, M.D.: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/10\/05\/opinion\/ai-chatgpt-medicine-doctor.html\"><em>I\u2019m a Doctor. ChatGPT\u2019s Bedside Manner Is Better Than Mine<\/em><\/a><strong>. <\/strong>As Dr. Reisman concludes:<\/p>\n<p>In the end, it doesn\u2019t actually matter if doctors feel compassion or empathy toward patients; it only matters if they act like it. In much the same way, it doesn\u2019t matter that A.I. has no idea what we, or it, are even talking about.<\/p>\n<p>I think of another quote from Professor Brynjolfsson, from a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/tech\/ai\/future-of-ai-2030-experts-654fcbfe\"><em>WSJ<\/em> article<\/a> earlier this year: \u201cThis recognizes that tasks\u2014not jobs, products, or skills\u2014are the fundamental units of organizations.\u201d \u00a0I.e., when it comes to thinking about the future of your job, you really need to be recognizing which tasks in it could be done as well or better by automation\/AI. They\u2019re going to be more than you might like. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The future is here.<\/p>\n<p><em>Kim is a former emarketing exec at a major Blues plan, editor of the late &amp; lamented\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/tincture.io\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Tincture.io<\/em><\/a><em>, and now regular THCB contributor<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By KIM BELLARD Earlier this month U.S. dockworkers struck, for the first time in decades. Their union, the International Longshoremen\u2019s Association (ILW), was demanding a 77% pay increase, rejecting an offer of a 50% pay increase from the shipping companies. People worried about the impact on the economy, how it might impact the upcoming election,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1386,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1387"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1387\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1386"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}