{"id":3387,"date":"2025-01-29T08:36:00","date_gmt":"2025-01-29T08:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/?p=3387"},"modified":"2025-01-29T08:36:00","modified_gmt":"2025-01-29T08:36:00","slug":"doctors-must-fight-the-rfk-nomination","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/?p=3387","title":{"rendered":"Doctors Must Fight the RFK Nomination"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n<\/div>\n

By DANIEL STONE<\/p>\n

As a doctor, I consider Secretary Xavier Becerra and his Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to be allies of practitioners like me. The behemoth federal agency administers Medicare and Medicaid, the Food and Drug Administration, and an army of public health workers. The Surgeon General, symbolic leader of the nation\u2019s healthcare providers, reports to HHS. For decades, the Department has supported medical science in safeguarding the public\u2019s health. Now that sacred trust faces the threat of Donald Trump\u2019s nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to run HHS.<\/p>\n

RFK\u2019s first problem is a stunning lack of qualifications. After a laudable triumph over drug addiction, he used his legal background to work on environmental protection. Kennedy never held a federal government position nor administered any public agency. He now appears poised for on-the-job training at an agency with 80,000 employees and a $1.7 Trillion budget. In contrast, Becerra served for years in Congress and on its Health Sub-Committee. He also served as State Attorney General, managing 4,800 employees. The qualification issue is not political. During Trump\u2019s first term, his last HHS secretary, Alex Azar, had served as HHS general counsel and president of pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly. RFK has nothing remotely resembling his would-be predecessors\u2019 qualifications.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, RFK\u2019s shortcomings go well beyond mere lack of qualification. His distortions and public denials of established medical science infuriate practitioners like me. He casts baseless doubt on the well-established benefits of vaccines and on the polio vaccine in particular<\/a>. Despite the seven decades since polio vaccine\u2019s introduction, doctors still see patients who were infected before it was available. My patient Donna, born in 1955, counts herself among this group. She wears leg braces and often struggles with daily activities. For me, she symbolizes those who by accident of birth or happenstance missed the profound benefits of vaccines that RFK now disparages.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

RFK also opposes fluoridation of water. Another patient, Judith, age 80, scoffs at such skepticism. She grew up in Niagara Falls, NY, before fluoridation and its dental protection. She remembers her childhood dentist finding 13 cavities and the trauma and pain of prolonged dental work at an early age.<\/p>\n

Primary care doctors like me spend our professional lives working to prevent life limiting and life-threatening conditions like those affecting Donna and Judith. We struggle with the challenges of insurance denials, clunky electronic records, healthcare bureaucracy and ballooning patient loads. We don\u2019t need an HHS administrator opposing our efforts to provide standard preventive care. And if RFK\u2019s judgment on vaccines is so poor, who can trust him on other critical healthcare issues like pandemic management or drug authorizations?<\/p>\n

How should physicians respond? I recently exchanged messages with a politically diverse group of local medical leaders. They all opposed RFK but disagreed on tactics. Some said that the American Medical Association leadership believes RFK to be headed for confirmation. They fear that failed opposition might jeopardize RFK\u2019s support on Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements.<\/p>\n

The local doctors\u2019 reasoning reflects the same transactional \u201cwhat\u2019s in it for me\u201d approach that led to RFK\u2019s nomination. RFK mortgaged a share of the Kennedy legacy to help Trump win the Presidency. Now Trump is returning the favor with a cabinet position despite RFK\u2019s lack of qualifications and practitioners\u2019 opposition. Should organized medicine really adopt the same \u201cwhat\u2019s in it for us\u201d approach?<\/p>\n

I told my colleagues that I can accept being on the losing side. Despite my efforts, my patients sometimes get sick and even die. But I don\u2019t quit on them or ask, \u201cwhat\u2019s in it for me?\u201d So I will not shrug my shoulders as those representing America\u2019s doctors swallow RFK\u2019s nomination like a dose of castor oil. The senators voting on RFK have their own doctors and medical societies in their home states. Those doctors must explain to their senators why RFK is unacceptable to those on healthcare\u2019s front lines.<\/p>\n

I will not shrug my shoulders as those representing America\u2019s doctors swallow RFK\u2019s nomination like a dose of castor oil. I have belonged to the California Medical Association for more than 20 years and to the American College of Physicians, the nation\u2019s largest medical trade association, for over 30. Although proud of those associations, I will resign from both if they fail to issue strong, evidence-based statements explaining why the RFK nomination is unacceptable. I hope my colleagues do likewise.<\/p>\n

As physicians, we take an oath to do no harm. Sometimes doing nothing causes harm. It is time for organized medicine to do the right thing and fight the RFK nomination.<\/p>\n

Daniel Stone is a practicing internist and geriatrician with Cedars Sinai Medical Group. This piece was originally published in the Jewish Journal<\/a><\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By DANIEL STONE As a doctor, I consider Secretary Xavier Becerra and his Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to be allies of practitioners like me. The behemoth federal agency administers Medicare and Medicaid, the Food and Drug Administration, and an army of public health workers. The Surgeon General, symbolic leader of the nation\u2019s…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":3382,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3387"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3387\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3382"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medical-article.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}