Why CREST-2 Trial Results Should Inform, Not Replace, Clinical Judgment

While CREST-2 can stand as a guideline for understanding ACS therapies in case-by-case scenarios, it’s critical that trial conclusions do not replace clinical judgment and years of previous research.

The post Why CREST-2 Trial Results Should Inform, Not Replace, Clinical Judgment appeared first on MedCity News.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *